They (Siamese elite) call them (RED SHIRT) a terrorist group!

Written by The Son Of the Khmer Empire

May 10, 2010 at 4:27pm

In this picture is the alleged terrorist network the elite and Democrats in Bangkok accused of.

NOTE:  The elite in Bangkok call this network  – the RED NETWORK, as a terrorist group aiming at destroying Thailand.

To my point of view such a negative painting colour to the RED network is unacceptable and will affect Thailand future’s reconciliation since the RED have been deprived of their freedom to democracy, due process before the law, health care, and economic justice, and ignored their dignity. My question is that how can one work without a network? How can this group become  so popular among the majority of Thai people if it is a terrorist group and its oversea branches are not banned by the international communities?  And why don’t  interpol arrest Thaksin if he supports a terrorist group?

The problem today in Thailand is deeply rooted in Thai society created by hierarchical system and monarchism, and the Bangkok elite can’t  solve this issue by accusing its opponent -the RED, of being a terrorist to gain national and international support to justify its handling the country with injustice, violence, and double standard system.  For instance, the crack down on the RED is always carried out with more harsh and violent in both military and legal actions compared to the crack down on the Yellow.

Actually, I am for Thaksin even I am against his friend – Hun Xen of Cambodia, for he did help the North and North Eastern people, not because most of them are descendants of Khmer Empire and Laos, but because he helped improve their living standards and dignity.

Lesson learned: The elite in Bangkok always treat their poor compatriots just like they treat their poorer neighbors – Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar.

Thai royal asks Thai Parliament to stop debate on Khmer-Thai border issue

Written by The Son Of the Khmer Empire

May 10, 2010 at 4:17 pm

With or without negotiations with Thailand, Preah Vihear temple belongs to Cambodia!

Thailand’s ASTV Manager Online news media reported on 07 May that Princess Walvipa Charoonroj sent a letter to the

Thai Parliament asking the latter not to debate on the Cambodian-Thai border topic. Tith Sothea, mouthpiece of the Press and Quick Reaction Unit of Cambodia’s Council of Ministers, criticized this Thai princess, saying that she is countercurrent to the desire by the two countries that want to see a rapid end to the border dispute.

A Thai royal by the name of Princess (Mam Luong) Walvipa Charoonroj wrote a letter to the Thai Parliament to cancel the debate on the Cambodian-Thai border issue during its plenary session. This information was reported by Thailand’s ASTV Manager Online news media on 07 may 2010.

The Thai princess explained that the Cambodia-Thailand border issue, even though it is abiding by the law, is an issue in which Cambodia has the advantage over Thailand, and at the end, the result will show the trampling on history in the border demarcation at Preah Vihear temple. The temple which was the topic of a lawsuit between Cambodia and Thailand at The Hague International Court of Justice, was given back to Cambodia in 1962.

Regarding the request made by Princess Walvipa Charonroj, Tith Sothea, mouthpiece of the Press and Quick Reaction Unit of Cambodia’s Council of Ministers, commented that the prince is a Thai extremist who is preventing the border resolution negotiations between the two countries. Tith Sothea added that the princess’ action is counterculture to the desire of both the Cambodian and Thai governments which want to see a rapid end to the dispute and a restart of the development and the friendship and cooperation between the two countries.

Koy Kuong, spokesman for the ministry of Foreign Affairs, commented that the claim that the prince made about Cambodia having the advantage over Thailand is the reality because Cambodia can base on internationally-recognized documents and maps.

It should be noted that there were numerous negotiations between Cambodia and Thailand [on the border dispute]. During these rounds of negotiations, the two sides took note on a number of agreements that Thailand must obtain the approval from its Parliament on the outcome of these discussions. However, since the beginning of the border discussions, no negotiation documents was debated by the Thai Parliament yet, this issue led to a dead end in the border negotiations between the two countries.