Siam psychopath: They are committing an illegitimate act against their country’s law and the international treaty 2000MoU

The Son Of the Khmer Empire

Extremist Network of Thai Patriots

NOTE: I wonder if the man who holds the banner in the picture which demand the 2000 MoU be revoked understands what the content of the 2000 MoU is about.

Look at them, they are freely holding demonstration which is banned by Emergency Degree declared by Abhisit’s govt since  May 2010 during the Red protest in Bangkok. Judging from this, how can we expect these scambag people to respect the international laws while they ignore  the laws in their own country.

With this, I do agree with former Siamese prime minister Chuan Leekpai who clearly said that: ” Siamese people’s disrespect for laws is the root of all country’s current problem.”

Siam psychopath: Abhishit’s last resorts against Cambodia “Democracy and Military”

The Son Of the Khmer Empire

The thief chief: Abhishit

In response to his alliance extremist PAD’s call to revoke 2000 MoU and retake the lands around Prasat Preah Vihear at the protest  site, Abhishit clearly made his political stance against Cambodia that the last resort he will take is to use both democracy and military.

“About the land encroachment, we will cancel the MOU if the problem can’t be settled. We will use both democratic and military means,” Abhisit said, referring to the plot near the temple.

NOTE: Reading the statement from Abhishit we can understand that:

• ” The democratic means”  means that the democracy in his camp -the extremist PAD.
• ” The military means” means full invasion on Cambodia to retake Prasat Preah Vihear and the surrounding lands.
• Abhishit and those extremist PAD must understand that in article VIII of the 2000 MoU, it prohibits a  state party involved from revoking it unilaterally.

So let’s see if the world allow him and his extremist group to carry out such an illegitimate means against other nation in this 21th century.

---

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

• Siam to Terminate the 2001- MOU

Duch hires Cambodian lawyer

FRIDAY, 06 AUGUST 2010 18:08
By: JAMES O’TOOLE
Phnompenhpost

Photo by: COURTESY OF THE ECCC Tuol Sleng prison chief Kaing Guek Eav (centre) appears at the Khmer Rouge tribunal last year with co-lawyers Francois Roux (left) and Kar Savuth

FORMER Tuol Sleng prison chief Kaing Guek Eav has hired a Cambodian attorney to replace Francois Roux, the international co-lawyer he dismissed last month after breaking with him in stunning fashion during closing arguments of the Khmer Rouge tribunal’s first case.

The Khmer Rouge jailer, better known as Duch, last week became the first person convicted at Cambodia’s war crimes tribunal, receiving a 30-year sentence for crimes against humanity and grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions. With credit for time already served in detention, he stands to spend roughly 19 more years in prison.

Although Duch reportedly wanted a Chinese lawyer to replace Roux – “He doesn’t want a lawyer from a free country to judge the communist people,” defence attorney Kar Savuth explained last month – he will settle for 41-year-old Kang Ritheary, a private practice attorney with the Asean International Law Group in Phnom Penh.

“Kaing Guek Eav had provided the Defence Support Section with certain criterions for the selection of an international co-lawyer,” United Nations court spokesman Lars Olsen said Friday.

“The Defence Support Section did not find any international lawyers that met those criterions. Therefore, Kaing Guek Eav chose instead to be represented by two Cambodian lawyers.”

Defendants at the tribunal are typically represented by one Cambodian and one international lawyer each, with some enlisting additional lawyers and consultants.

Kar Savuth said last week that Duch planned to appeal the judgment against him. Duch has also been a subject of investigation in the court’s second case, but a January order from the court’s Co-Investigating Judges indicated that he would not be indicted; as such, Kang Ritheary’s work with Duch will likely be limited to appeal proceedings before the Supreme Court Chamber.

Kang Ritheary served as an adviser to the Documentation Centre of Cambodia, which has helped gather much of the evidence used by the tribunal, from 1997 to 2001. He served as a government lawyer from 1995 to 2001, according to a copy of his CV posted on the Asean International Law Group website.

Last month, prior to the verdict, the court announced that Duch had dismissed Francois Roux due to a “loss of confidence” in his representation. This followed the dramatic split from Roux by Duch and Kar Savuth during last November’s closing arguments, when the pair bucked the defence’s long-running strategy of expressing remorse and limited responsibility for the crimes committed at Tuol Sleng. Instead, they called for Duch’s acquittal and release, a turnabout that Roux later called a “bad surprise”.

Roux has since moved on to head the Defence Office at the UN-backed Special Tribunal for Lebanon.

PCCS union leader warns of more strikes

FRIDAY, 06 AUGUST 2010 15:02
By: KIM YUTHANA AND CAMERON WELLS
Phnompenhpost

AUNION representative at a factory owned by PCCS Garments Ltd threatened yesterday to organise more strikes unless management dropped a court complaint accusing her of faking thumbprints in order to collect the wages of other workers.

Around 3,000 workers from the factory held a 10-day strike following the dismissal of union organiser Morn Channa, who was fired last month after telling management that workers did not need a doctor’s note in order to apply for sick leave.

She was reinstated following mediation between the two parties at the Ministry of Labour’s Arbitration Council, and workers returned to work on Wednesday.

But Morn Channa appeared at Phnom Penh Municipal Court yesterday to answer questions related to a complaint filed by the factory owners on July 22 – a day after her dismissal – accusing her of faking thumbprints so she could cash workers’ wages.

“Being a representative of the workers, I have been asked by them to collect their thumbprints to cash their wages for them, because about 10 workers were sick and asked me to do so,” she said. “The factory allowed this process.”

She said that she would order further strikes if the complaint by the factory was not immediately dropped.

Eric Mah, administration and human resources manager at PCCS, said the company could not withdraw the complaint because it was in the hands of the courts.

He said that the threat of further strikes was an attempt by Morn Channa to use the workers as a “weapon”.

“She thumbprinted to get the money for the people, but the people didn’t know about it,” he said. “In this country, if a criminal breaks the law, can they threaten to use workers to get them free? They cannot.”

On July 27, around 50 riot police descended on the factory and tried to force the estimated 3,000 employees back to work. A handful of workers were injured during the fracas, and some demonstrators pelted policemen with plastic chairs and water bottles.

Thai man sentenced for killing girlfriend

FRIDAY, 06 AUGUST 2010 15:02
By: CHRANN CHAMROEUN
Phnompenhpost

Sarisi Boon Sry is led into Phnom Penh Municipal Court yesterday. The Thai national was found guilty of killing his girlfriend and given an 11-year prison term.(Photo by: Pha Lina)

PHNOM Penh Municipal Court yesterday convicted a Thai man of killing his girlfriend last year at a guesthouse in Daun Penhdistrict, sentencing him to 11 years in jail and ordering him to pay 30 million riels (US$7,109) in compensation to the victim’s family.

Sarisi Boon Sry, 37, was arrested on October 12 from a construction site after being accused of strangling a Cambodian woman, 22-year-old Voeun Srey Mao, a day earlier at the Ly Hour Guesthouse. According to a police note, the victim’s father, Ho Voeu, requested that the accused be prosecuted and asked for $25,000 in compensation.

Deputy prosecutor Koeur Bunnara said yesterday that the verdict was acceptable.

“The sentence of 11 years for the Thai man really gives justice to the victim,” he said.

But after the verdict was handed down, defence lawyer Touch Chhay described the sentence as “an injustice” for his client.

“There was a lack of evidence, and it was only based on a doctoral examination of the killing,” he said.

“I raised this in the last hearing. If the victim was killed by strangling, there must have been fighting and other rooms in the guesthouse must have heard the struggle.”